Are You sure you want to delete Member from list ?
Refuting Myths of Islam’s Rise
The success of the call of Muhammad SAW is uniquely clear in history, with reasons that are straightforward and compelling.
The conditions of the time were ripe for his mission, and he was uniquely qualified because of his circumstances to deliver it. Wonder on wonders, He had the eloquent tongue and language. He had the power to bring hearts together and gain trust.
He had the power of faith in his call and his eagerness to make it a success.
Nothing can distract from these clear reasons, except a delusive desire to claim, the success is only driven by sword and temptations of paradise pleasures.
What terrorism and what sword! The early Muslims did not rally around a powerful, well-armed Prophet, on the contrary they embraced Islam despite the swords of strong controlling folks. They were driven out of their homes to save themselves from the venom of Quraysh tyrants. It was only after they had increased in numbers and supported each other, carried swords to resist the evil. The Prophet did not entirely initiated all the wars he entered, whereas all his wars were defensive and protective.
On the other hand, regarding temptations of paradise pleasures, then rich self indulged, wicked polytheists will be more likely to accept the call, because it’s harder for one accustomed to luxury to embrace deprivation than for one who has never known it.
Abu Lahab was not disinterested in luxury than Umar was. Actually the story of Umar, accepting Islam is exemplary in refuting the claims of threats and temptation. He went to kill Muhammad by his sword, but no Muslim targeted him by a sword. And he recited part of the Chapter Taha that has no mention of wine or pleasure. He was transformed by the power of the word.
When we examine two parties, we find clear difference, of good and evil, those who heeded the truth and those who arrogantly rejected it. While it is not the difference between those who seek pleasure and those who forsake it.
